Breaking News: Savannah Guthrie just got the police update every parent dreads. Hear her tearful words and the devastating details that have ended the search.

 

Nancy Guthrie vanished, and the word no family ever wants to hear was whispered into the room like a dagger: abduction. An 84-year-old mother, once the quiet center of her family’s life, suddenly disappeared without explanation. The home that had always been a haven of familiar routines—the smell of morning coffee, the soft shuffle of slippers across the floor, the hum of an old refrigerator—was now cordoned off with police tape. Federal support was called in, local officers combed every corner, and the property was treated as a crime scene. Every passing hour without news felt like a battle being fought in silence, each tick of the clock a relentless reminder of what was at stake. Friends and neighbors whispered anxiously to one another, but even the closest community members could only watch and wait, powerless against the unknown.

In Tucson, the usual calm of the Catalina Foothills had been replaced by flashing lights, the whine of sirens, and the sterile precision of investigators mapping every inch of the landscape. The quiet routines of an elderly woman—the morning stretches of sunlight through the windows, her habit of sitting by the kitchen table with a cup of tea, the slow shuffle of her feet as she tended small tasks—were replaced by the stark markers of an investigation. Evidence flags dotted the lawn, and teams of K-9 units sniffed the perimeter for any trace of her presence. Her neighbors, once accustomed to nods in the driveway and casual hellos over fences, were now on high alert, their curiosity replaced by anxiety. According to investigators, Nancy Guthrie did not simply wander off; there was no reason to believe she left on her own. Her absence from church, her sudden silence on the phone, and the unusual state of her home turned what would normally be a routine family check-in into a nationwide emergency that has gripped the hearts of millions.

For Savannah Guthrie, the co-anchor millions recognize on morning television, the situation was unthinkable. She, who usually reports breaking news to a nation, had become part of a story she never wished to live. Each passing minute brought with it a torrent of conflicting emotions: disbelief, fear, and the gnawing frustration of helplessness. Savannah’s life had always been measured in deadlines, scripts, and headlines, but now every broadcast, every alert, every news clip carried a weight far heavier than professional responsibility. The timelines she had spent years teaching viewers to dissect were now deeply personal. Surveillance footage was scoured not for a story, but in desperate hope for a clue. Every tip from the public was more than a lead—it was a potential lifeline.

The unfolding investigation had transformed the once-tranquil neighborhood into a hub of organized chaos. Federal agents, county detectives, and local volunteers moved with methodical urgency, checking each driveway, examining cars, and reviewing hours of doorbell camera footage. The usual cadence of Tucson life—the distant barking of dogs, the early morning joggers, the low hum of traffic—was overlaid with the tension of flashing emergency lights and the constant hum of radios. In the air hung an almost tangible sense of dread: the knowledge that a single misstep or overlooked clue could mean the difference between resolution and tragedy.

Meanwhile, Savannah, often composed and articulate in front of a live camera, found herself navigating uncharted emotional terrain. The lines she spoke on-air were laced with personal worry, her voice occasionally breaking as she addressed viewers and colleagues alike. For the nation watching, it was a reminder that behind every familiar face in the news, there is a human being capable of unimaginable fear. She appeared on panels, not to analyze facts, but to plead for vigilance: “If anyone has seen my mother, or notices anything unusual, please step forward,” she urged, each word carrying the raw weight of a daughter’s desperation. Her typical professional polish was stripped away, replaced by a vulnerability that resonated with viewers across the country.

The public response mirrored the gravity of the situation. Social media platforms were inundated with posts sharing Nancy’s image, urging anyone with information to come forward. Neighborhoods far from Tucson reported checking on elderly relatives and neighbors, spurred by the fear that what happened to one could happen to many. News organizations across the nation covered every development, broadcasting live from the scene, replaying timelines, and interviewing law enforcement officials. For millions, the story was no longer just another missing person case—it was a collective holding of breath, a national vigil suspended between hope and dread.

Every detail of the investigation heightened the sense of urgency. The search radius expanded into surrounding canyons, dry washes, and rugged terrain where an 84-year-old could be easily concealed by the unforgiving desert landscape. Specialized units, including thermal drones and search-and-rescue teams, combed the area systematically, mapping every possible route and checking every abandoned structure. Authorities emphasized that time was critical; the first 24 to 48 hours are often decisive in cases of abduction, especially involving seniors. Each new piece of evidence was scrutinized with painstaking attention: a missing item, a door left ajar, a neighbor recalling a fleeting detail—any of these could be the breakthrough needed to bring Nancy home.

For Savannah, the emotional toll was relentless. She oscillated between hope and despair, each phone call, each meeting with detectives, and each update on social media triggering waves of anxiety. She leaned on close friends and family, yet the pressure of maintaining a public presence made the burden heavier. Interviews with news outlets became a delicate dance: speaking just enough to maintain public engagement while preserving personal boundaries. Every interaction reminded her that millions were watching, empathizing, praying, and, in some small way, participating in the search.

The phrase “abduction” hung over the investigation like a shadow, chilling not only the immediate family but the national audience. It framed every movement, every decision, every appeal for information. Police cautioned against speculation, yet the human need for answers persisted. The slow, agonizing pauses between leads, the moments of silence when no new information arrived, created a tension that seemed almost unbearable. Hope had to exist in that fragile space, where fear and faith were in constant negotiation.

The story of Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance is now etched into the consciousness of a nation. It is not just a tale of a missing elderly woman, but a story of a daughter’s love under siege, a community mobilized by fear and compassion, and a law enforcement apparatus working tirelessly to piece together an elusive truth. Until someone comes forward or new evidence emerges, the country remains suspended, caught between the terror of the unknown and the desperate hope that Nancy Guthrie will be found safe. For Savannah, every broadcast, every update, every message from the public is a reminder that the search is far from over—but so too is the resilience of those who refuse to let hope die.

Investigators Share New Clues as Search for Nancy Guthrie Reaches a Critical Moment!

The search for 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie has escalated into a tense, high-stakes forensic investigation, as the Pima County Sheriff’s Department shifts its focus from a routine missing-person search to what is now a potentially violent criminal abduction.

What initially seemed like an ordinary disappearance in a quiet Tucson neighborhood has, in just over a week, transformed into a case marked by urgency, fear, and a mounting stack of grim evidence. Authorities describe this moment as “critical”, a window where each passing hour could mean the difference between life and death, and the evidence being uncovered paints an increasingly chilling portrait of the events that unfolded on the night of January 31, 2026.

Nancy, a lifelong pillar of her community, known for her punctuality, warmth, and steadfast routines, was last seen that Saturday evening after a family gathering. She was dropped off at her home around 9:30 PM, and for those who watched her walk to her front door, it seemed like the ordinary conclusion to a pleasant evening.

But the next morning, when her familiar seat at her local church remained empty, alarm bells rang immediately. Deputies who arrived at her residence were confronted with a scene that defied any explanation of a simple wandering: Nancy’s vehicle was parked exactly where she left it, her purse, cell phone, and—most alarmingly—her daily medications remained untouched inside.

A Frightening Forensic Turning Point

The trajectory of the investigation shifted dramatically when authorities turned their attention from the inside of the home to its exterior threshold. A significant quantity of blood discovered on the front porch was subjected to DNA analysis and confirmed to be Nancy Guthrie’s. Coupled with evidence of disturbed entry points and signs of struggle, the case immediately escalated into a full-scale criminal investigation.

Experts describe the porch evidence as indicative of a blitz-style encounter—an abrupt, predatory confrontation that likely occurred before Nancy could even lock her doors or call for help. For medical professionals, the fact that her essential medications were left behind is especially harrowing, as it makes it physiologically impossible for Nancy, with her limited mobility, to have traveled any significant distance without assistance.

Federal Involvement and the Digital Hunt

Given the complexity of the situation and its national profile, federal agencies, including the FBI’s Evidence Response Team, have been called in to assist. Investigators are conducting a comprehensive digital canvass, mapping Nancy’s last known movements and the surrounding environment. This painstaking effort involves extracting data from neighborhood Ring cameras, smart traffic sensors, cellular tower pings, and even local social media activity. Every camera angle, every timestamp, and every digital footprint is being scrutinized for anomalies.

Specialized units are also looking for behavioral clues: was Nancy targeted deliberately, or was this a crime of opportunity? Was the forced entry executed by someone familiar with the layout of the house, or was it a hurried, chaotic act? Each detail could shift the entire understanding of how this seemingly serene neighborhood became the stage for a terrifying incident.

The Agony of Uncertainty

For Savannah Guthrie, the Today show co-anchor and Nancy’s daughter, the transformation of the case from a missing-person alert to a criminal investigation has been agonizing. She has used her platform not to sensationalize, but to issue disciplined pleas for public vigilance, reminding the community to remain alert and provide actionable information. Despite the discovery of blood at the scene, authorities continue to operate under the “presumption of life”, noting that many victims have been recovered against the odds, even in cases with evidence of violent struggle.

Public response in Tucson has been unprecedented. Volunteers have canvassed neighborhoods, scoured trails, and shared digital leads with authorities. But law enforcement warns of the dangers of digital vigilantism: speculative theories and online accusations can endanger innocent individuals and overwhelm critical tip lines. Citizens are urged to focus on verifiable evidence, such as dashcam footage or security recordings, rather than conjecture.

A Community on Edge

The disappearance has altered the very fabric of the neighborhood. Streets once considered safe are now patrolled with vigilance, and a pervasive tension lingers as residents ask themselves: how could a grandmother vanish from her own doorstep? Local authorities have increased patrols not only to search for clues, but also to reassure the shaken community. Discussions about senior safety, home security, and the vulnerabilities of aging populations have intensified, highlighting a broader social concern sparked by this single case.

The Race Against Time

As forensic teams painstakingly analyze porch evidence and federal investigators trace Nancy’s digital footprint, the “safest place she knew”—her home—has become the epicenter of a nationwide mystery.

Every hour that passes without a sighting intensifies the pressure on authorities to convert these clues into actionable leads. The blood on the porch and evidence of forced entry serve as grim reminders that this investigation is now both a hunt for a perpetrator and a search for a survivor.

The house stands silent, frozen in time, as investigators piece together the events of a dark Arizona night. Every detail, no matter how minute, could hold the key to Nancy Guthrie’s return. And for Savannah, the nation, and her community, the hope that she might yet be found remains fragile—but unbroken.

SAD NEWS 15 minutes ago in New York, Savannah Guthrie was confirmed as! See NOW

 

In the quiet, sun-drenched foothills of Tucson, where the jagged silhouettes of saguaro cacti usually stand as silent sentinels over peaceful retirement communities, a nightmare has unfolded. The home of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of TODAY show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, has been transformed into a chilling scene of violence and mystery. What began as a routine welfare check has escalated into a high-stakes abduction investigation, capturing the nation’s attention and leaving a family reeling from the sudden, brutal disappearance of their matriarch.

The scene at the Guthrie residence resembles something from the pages of a dark crime thriller rather than a quiet Arizona neighborhood. Investigators arriving at the property encountered clear signs of a struggle. A faint but unmistakable trail of blood led from the front steps toward the desert scrub. Perhaps most unsettling was the state of the home’s security system: a Ring camera had been violently ripped from its mounting by the door, its wires exposed like raw nerves. It was a deliberate act, suggesting that whoever targeted Nancy Guthrie knew the perimeter was under digital watch and sought to leave no electronic witness behind.

Inside, the contrast was striking. The home itself appeared largely undisturbed. Half-finished books, family photographs, and the familiar trappings of a grandmother’s life remained in place, standing in stark defiance of the chaos at the threshold. With no valuables taken, the focus of the investigation has shifted from a random burglary to something far more personal and sinister.

For Savannah Guthrie, who has spent decades reporting on the world’s most harrowing tragedies with poise and professionalism, the ordeal is painfully personal. The “SAD NEWS” prompt that normally appears on her teleprompter has become the headline of her daily life. To be the face of national news while simultaneously living its worst chapters is a unique and cruel form of purgatory. Where she once bridged the public to the truth, she now stands behind yellow police tape, suspended in agonizing uncertainty.

Law enforcement in Arizona has been tight-lipped, a silence often indicative of either a delicate ongoing operation or a lack of actionable leads. Officials have confirmed Nancy was likely abducted but have yet to name a primary suspect or motive. Forensic analysis of the blood at the scene remains a critical piece of the puzzle, as investigators work to determine whether it belongs to the victim, an intruder, or both. The removal of the security camera indicates a level of premeditation that has prompted the FBI and local task forces to consider not only transient criminals but also more sophisticated perpetrators or individuals with a personal vendetta.

Nancy Guthrie’s age and health amplify the urgency. At 84, each hour away from her normal routine and medical care presents a significant risk. Research on elderly abductions shows that the first 24 to 48 hours are critical for a successful recovery. While such incidents are rare compared to other demographics, they are often linked to financial exploitation or domestic disputes. Yet the violent nature of this intrusion—the blood and destroyed surveillance equipment—suggests a far more aggressive confrontation.

Public attention has reached a fever pitch, fueled by the 24-hour news cycle and the prominence of the family involved. In Tucson, a sense of unease hangs over the foothills. Neighbors who once left doors unlocked now watch the desert with suspicion, questioning how a woman could vanish so completely from a community defined by security and serenity.

Federal authorities have reportedly joined the investigation, particularly after reports surfaced about a person of interest connected to prior cases in other states. Mentions of an “Ex-LA County Employee” in secondary reports have added shockwaves, though Tucson police urge the public to rely only on verified information. The combination of a high-profile media figure and a violent crime against a vulnerable elder has created intense public scrutiny and investigative pressure.

Beyond the headlines, the human toll is profound. Savannah Guthrie’s colleagues at NBC have expressed their support, but her absence from the anchor desk is a constant reminder of the empty chair at the family dinner table. The Guthries are working closely with victim advocates and private investigators, holding onto fragments of hope, bolstered by an outpouring of support from viewers who feel personally connected to the family after years of morning broadcasts.

The desert is vast, and its silence can be merciless. As the sun sets over the Tucson mountains, casting long orange shadows across the crime scene, the search for Nancy Guthrie continues with desperate intensity. Every lead—whether a suspicious vehicle sighting, a neighbor’s half-remembered detail, or forensic evidence from the ripped camera—is being scrutinized.

Nancy Guthrie’s story is a stark reminder that no one is immune to violence and that even the most public lives can be thrust into the deepest, most private darkness. For now, the nation waits alongside a daughter who has spent her career telling others’ stories, praying she will soon be able to tell the story of her mother’s safe return. The blood on the steps and the missing camera mark the beginning of a mystery that the Guthrie family—and the country—desperately wants solved.

Why an ‘M’ Pattern Appears on Some People’s Palms

 

Have you ever paused for a moment to look closely at your palms and wondered what all those lines might mean?

The human hand is a remarkable and complex structure, and the intricate patterns etched into our palms have fascinated people for thousands of years.

Across cultures and centuries, these lines have been interpreted as symbols of personality, emotional tendencies, and life experiences. For some, palm lines are nothing more than natural creases formed by movement and genetics.

For others, particularly those interested in palmistry, they are believed to offer insight into character, strengths, challenges, and potential paths in life.

One of the most talked-about palm features is the appearance of a shape resembling the letter “M” formed by the intersection of major palm lines.

According to palm readers and enthusiasts of hand analysis, people who display this marking are thought to possess heightened intuition, leadership qualities, and a strong sense of purpose.

Popular culture has amplified this belief, often associating the “M” shape with well-known figures such as Meghan Markle, Hillary Clinton, and Robert De Niro.

But where do these ideas come from, and what do they really mean?

Palmistry: An Ancient Practice, Not a Science
Palmistry, also known as chiromancy, is an ancient interpretive tradition that dates back thousands of years. It has roots in India, China, Greece, Egypt, and parts of the Middle East.

Historically, palmistry was practiced alongside astrology and other symbolic systems as a way of understanding human nature and destiny.

It is important to clarify, however, that palmistry is considered a cultural and spiritual tradition rather than a scientific discipline. There is no medical or scientific evidence proving that palm lines can predict future events or determine success, intelligence, or personality traits.

Modern palmists themselves often emphasize that palm reading is an interpretive art. Rather than predicting the future, many practitioners believe palm lines reflect tendencies, emotional patterns, and life experiences that may evolve over time.

Just like fingerprints, no two palms are exactly the same. While fingerprints are studied scientifically for identification, palm lines are shaped by a combination of genetics, hand movement, and development in the womb. Their uniqueness is undeniable, even if their meanings remain subjective.

The Major Lines of the Palm and Their Traditional Meanings
In palmistry, readers typically focus on several major lines. These lines are not viewed as fixed predictions, but rather as symbolic indicators used for interpretation.

The Heart Line
The heart line runs horizontally across the upper part of the palm. Palmists traditionally associate it with emotional expression, relationships, and how a person approaches love.

A curved heart line is often interpreted as openness and warmth, while a straighter line may suggest emotional reserve.

The Head Line
The head line runs below the heart line and is linked to thinking style, intellect, and decision-making. Its length and shape are believed by palm readers to suggest whether someone is more analytical, imaginative, or intuitive.

The Life Line
One of the most misunderstood palm lines, the life line curves around the base of the thumb. Contrary to popular belief, it does not indicate lifespan. In palmistry, it is thought to reflect vitality, resilience, and major life changes.

The Fate Line
The fate line, when present, runs vertically toward the middle finger. Palmists associate it with career direction, life purpose, and external influences.

Some people have a strong fate line, while others have none at all—something palm readers interpret as flexibility rather than a lack of direction.

The Sun Line (Apollo Line)
This line is associated with creativity, fulfillment, and recognition. A clear sun line is traditionally interpreted as a sign of artistic expression or satisfaction with one’s achievements.

The “M” Shape: Symbolism and Popular Beliefs
When certain major lines intersect—most commonly the heart line, head line, life line, and sometimes the fate or sun line—they may form a shape resembling the letter “M.” In palmistry folklore, this formation has become one of the most celebrated markings.

According to palm readers, the “M” shape is believed to symbolize:

Strong intuition and insight

The ability to read people and situations effectively

Leadership tendencies

Confidence and determination

Potential for success in career or public life

It is often claimed in popular articles and social media posts that only 1–2% of people have this marking. However, it is important to note that this figure is not based on scientific population studies, but rather on anecdotal observations within palmistry communities.

Clarifying a Common Confusion: The Simian Line
The term “Simian line” (more accurately called the single transverse palmar crease) is frequently confused with the “M” shape, but they are not the same thing.

A true Simian line refers to a single crease that runs straight across the palm, formed when the head line and heart line merge into one. This crease is a naturally occurring anatomical variation and is present in a small percentage of the population.

Medical professionals study the Simian crease because it can appear in certain genetic conditions, though it is also found in completely healthy individuals. It is not, in medical terms, a marker of personality, intelligence, or destiny.

In palmistry traditions, some readers symbolically associate this line with intense focus or strong will, but these interpretations are cultural rather than scientific.

Dominant Hand vs. Non-Dominant Hand
Another commonly discussed idea in palmistry is the difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand. Traditional palm reading suggests:

The non-dominant hand represents inherited traits, potential, and inner character

The dominant hand reflects how those traits are expressed through choices and actions

For right-handed individuals, this means the left hand is often considered the “inner” hand, while the right shows how life unfolds. Left-handed individuals reverse this interpretation.

It’s important to stress again that this framework is part of palmistry tradition and belief, not empirical science.

Meghan Markle and Public Interest in Palmistry
Public fascination with palmistry often grows when celebrities are mentioned. Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has frequently been cited by palm readers as someone who appears to have an “M” formation on her palms.

In interviews with lifestyle publications, palm reader Gary Markwick described individuals with such markings as highly sensitive, focused, and driven.

He noted that people with strong palm features may be goal-oriented but can sometimes become narrowly focused on their ambitions.

Referring to Markle specifically, Markwick stated that having similar markings on both hands is uncommon and symbolically powerful within palmistry traditions. These observations, however, are interpretations rather than verifiable assessments.

Beyond palmistry, Markle’s public life and achievements are well documented. She is an actor, author, advocate for social issues, and co-founder of the Archewell Foundation with her husband, Prince Harry.

Her success can be attributed to education, opportunity, determination, and public engagement rather than palm markings.

Why Palmistry Continues to Fascinate People
Despite the lack of scientific validation, palmistry remains popular worldwide. One reason is its deeply personal nature. Looking at one’s hands creates an immediate connection, and interpretations often feel meaningful because they focus on identity, emotion, and potential.

Psychologists suggest that people may find value in palmistry for the same reasons they enjoy personality tests—it encourages self-reflection and storytelling. When presented responsibly, palmistry can function as a symbolic tool rather than a source of literal predictions.

A Balanced Perspective
It is essential to approach palmistry with curiosity rather than certainty. While palm readers may offer interpretations that resonate emotionally, these insights should never replace professional guidance, medical advice, or personal decision-making.

There is no credible evidence that palm lines determine intelligence, success, or destiny. What they can offer, for those who believe in them, is a framework for reflection and conversation.

What Do You See on Your Palm?
Whether you view palm lines as fascinating natural features or as symbols rich with traditional meaning, there is no denying their ability to spark curiosity. Your hands tell a story of movement, growth, and individuality—one shaped by biology, experience, and time.

So the next time you glance at your palm, you may see lines, creases, and patterns. Others might see symbols, metaphors, or inspiration. What matters most is how you choose to interpret them.

What do you see on your palm?

BREAKING – 10 MINUTES AGO, Police just called Savannah Guthrie to inform her they have detected a signal from her mother, she is currently, See now!

 

Police delivered a tense and fragile update to Savannah Guthrie in the ongoing search for her missing mother, revealing that investigators had detected a brief, unexplained signal that might be connected to her whereabouts. Authorities were careful to stress that it does not confirm a location and does not mean she has been found. Yet, in a case defined by uncertainty, the signal introduced a new and emotionally charged dimension—one that immediately shook the fragile equilibrium the family had been maintaining.

Officials familiar with the investigation said the signal appeared late last night during a routine sweep of regional communication frequencies. It was weak, intermittent, and fleeting—too faint to provide exact coordinates, yet distinct enough to stand out against background noise. Analysts believe it could indicate recent activity tied to her mother, leaving the possibility that she may still be alive hanging in the air.

The moment the signal was detected, search teams were redirected with urgency. Investigators retraced areas connected to prior leads, revisiting sites previously deprioritized. Despite hours of renewed effort on the ground, no physical evidence was recovered, and no further signals were detected. The opportunity opened by the transmission seemed to vanish as quickly as it appeared, leaving a jolt of hope suspended in uncertainty.

A police spokesperson spoke cautiously about the development, acknowledging both its significance and its limits. “This is not a confirmation of location,” the spokesperson said. “It is a development we cannot ignore. It represents both a source of hope and deep concern. We are treating it with the seriousness it warrants while continuing to follow established investigative protocols.”

Savannah Guthrie received the update directly, in a private call. Those close to the family describe her as resolute but visibly shaken—balancing cautious hope against the emotional toll of yet another unknown. The information did not provide answers; it introduced new questions, amplifying the tension in an already fraught situation.

The origin of the signal remains under analysis. Investigators are working to determine whether it came from a personal device, a secondary transmitter, or an environmental anomaly capable of mimicking meaningful data. Specialists are examining frequency patterns, timing, and interference to assess credibility and rule out false positives. Until that work is complete, any conclusions would be premature.

Authorities have urged the public to avoid speculation. In high-profile cases, unverified theories can spread quickly, complicating investigations and deepening the family’s distress. The ambiguity of the signal only intensifies the challenge: while it may point to recent activity, its brevity leaves investigators without the clarity needed to act decisively.

Behind the scenes, analysts are combing through data logs, correlating the signal with prior tips, time-stamped movements, and environmental factors. Search coordinators are reassessing deployments, ready to pivot if new information arises. Specific locations and methods remain undisclosed to protect the integrity of the investigation.

For the family, the update has reset the emotional clock. Days of quiet waiting gave way to a sudden spike of hope tempered by fear. Friends describe long hours of careful conversation, vigilant observation, and tightly held expectations—where hope is handled delicately, like glass.

Investigators acknowledge the human weight of this moment: a single data point that carries enormous emotional significance while offering little practical guidance. Every decision must be measured, every action precise. Law enforcement officials reiterated that progress is guided by evidence, not speculation.

As the investigation continues, the search may shift again. Analysts are expected to complete their assessment of the signal’s characteristics, and teams remain on standby should another trace emerge. Officials have promised updates only when verified, emphasizing accuracy over speed in a case that has offered little certainty.

For now, the central question remains: where is she—and what does this signal truly mean? Answers will depend on careful analysis, patience, and the hope that another clue may surface.

In the midst of uncertainty, the family and investigators hold a shared, fragile balance—hope tempered by caution, determination guided by facts, and hearts bracing for whatever revelation comes next.